Quoting Arelor to Nightfox <=-
Re: Intel: Once mighty, now falling?
By: Nightfox to All on Tue May 06 2025 09:54 pm
Not to say Intel is making bad stuff, but
it seems AMD has been fairly steadily popular with a lot of PC builders for several years.
Intel has actually been making bad stuff for a while, unless you don't consider CPUs that fry themselves on their own "bad". I think it is
13th and 14th generation, which is two generations of botched chips.
Older AMD CPU's actually did have hardware issues causing them to operate so hot that they would catch on fire and also fry the mobo. Note that I said 'older'.
poindexter FORTRAN wrote to Cougar428 <=-
Re: Intel: Once mighty, now f
By: Cougar428 to ARELOR on Thu May 15 2025 02:19 pm
Older AMD CPU's actually did have hardware issues causing them to operate so hot that they would catch on fire and also fry the mobo. Note that I said 'older'.
Funny coincidence. I'm re-watching "Halt and Catch Fire" while I'm
reading this.
Older AMD CPU's actually did have hardware issues causing them to operate
so hot that they would catch on fire and also fry the mobo. Note that I
said 'older'.
Funny coincidence. I'm re-watching "Halt and Catch Fire" while I'm reading this.
Funny coincidence. I'm re-watching "Halt and Catch Fire" while I'm
reading this.
I re-watched that a couple of years ago or so. Had forgotten how good it was, great stuff!
Re: Intel: Once mighty, now f
By: poindexter FORTRAN to Cougar428 on Thu May 15 2025 06:30 pm
Older AMD CPU's actually did have hardware issues causing them to
operate so hot that they would catch on fire and also fry the
mobo. Note that I said 'older'.
Funny coincidence. I'm re-watching "Halt and Catch Fire" while
I'm reading this.
Such a great show.
Dang it, now I want to re-watch it.
telnet://bbs.roonsbbs.hu:1212 <<=-
Such a great show.
Codefenix wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
Funny coincidence. I'm re-watching "Halt and Catch Fire" while I'm reading this.
Such a great show.
Dang it, now I want to re-watch it.
It wasn't actually bad hardware.
Primarily the 13th and 14th generation CPU's using the Raptor Lake
platform, and the issues were software related not actual hardware
issues. The problem stemmed from a microcode algorithm that caused
elevated operating voltages leading to CPU degradation and crashes.
Once they patched the code the problems went away.
Quoting Arelor to Cougar428 <=-
Re: Intel: Once mighty, now f
By: Cougar428 to ARELOR on Thu May 15 2025 02:19 pm
It wasn't actually bad hardware.
Primarily the 13th and 14th generation CPU's using the Raptor Lake
platform, and the issues were software related not actual hardware
issues. The problem stemmed from a microcode algorithm that caused
elevated operating voltages leading to CPU degradation and crashes.
Once they patched the code the problems went away.
That is semantics.
If a regular consumer bought a PolyStation 23 and it caught fire
during a normal operation, the regular consumer would think it is a hardware problem, even if it was caused by some BIOS bug. Low level software, firmware and the like are so tightly tied to the hardware
that you may as well say it is an integral part of the hardware
appliance you bought (and got toasted).
While technically correct, saying it is not a hardware problem and
that it can be fixed by patching comes across as telling people they
can fix a motherboard issue by unsoldering some EPROM and soldering an updated replacement, and therefore their motherboard is perfectly fine
and faultless.
I don't buy it. We are already giving the IT industry too much leeway
to produce crappy products. Let them own their failures.
Halt and Catch Fire was "just ok". I
wouldn't call it great. It's just that
there wasn't anything better with the
same subject matter. Same with that Mr.
Robot show. So many forced instances of
buzz words and computer jargon. It was
just OK.
I thought it handled the jargon just fine, not dwelling on any particular te or concepts. It was more about the characters, their personalities, struggle ambitions, and relationships between each other.
Totally get that, but when computers are a big part of the plot, you'd think you'd want to get the shit correct. You don't take a disk out of a Commodore and stick it in a PC to run the same program. Am I expecting too much?
I think the fix was to download the update and reboot the system. Of
course I may be wrong about how it was done, but you update drivers for
different hardware all the time. At every OS update.
Cougar428 wrote to ARELOR <=-
I don't buy it. We are already giving the IT industry too much leeway
to produce crappy products. Let them own their failures.
I would be happy to let them own their failure, like I said AMD chips
operated at such a high frequency to one up the competition that they
did actually catch fire. I guess if you never had it happen to you,
you would not appreciate the chaos.
Codefenix wrote to phigan <=-
I thought it handled the jargon just fine, not dwelling on any
particular terms or concepts. It was more about the characters, their personalities, struggles, ambitions, and relationships between each
other.
Quoting Arelor to Cougar428 <=-
Re: Intel: Once mighty, now f
By: Cougar428 to ARELOR on Mon May 19 2025 08:41 am
I think the fix was to download the update and reboot the system. Of
course I may be wrong about how it was done, but you update drivers for
different hardware all the time. At every OS update.
First of all, we are not talking about a driver. We are talking about
a bellow OS operation so it is a serious affair even if it seems clicky-clicky.
Second, you may upgrade your drivers all month log, but how many
upgrades are designed to prevent your hardware from catching fire?
I check the changelogs of the stuff I run quite often and I must say updates aimed at preventing catastrophical failure exist in the realm
of astronomically unfrequent events.
Seriously, if I was running production on a specific CPU model and it caught fire mid-operation, and the Intel representative told me that
it is ok because it is not a hardware problem, that it only takes a
UEFI update to fix, I would shove a whole rack full of servers up that guy's ass.
Sysop: | Karloch |
---|---|
Location: | Madrid, Spain |
Users: | 78 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 209:05:25 |
Calls: | 1,379 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 17,895 |
D/L today: |
1 files (75K bytes) |
Messages: | 65,857 |