Re: D&D etcã By: Tim Whitson to Felix on Wed Dec 16 2020 07:56 pmãã > Re: D&D etcã > By: Felix to All on Wed Dec 09 2020 08:33 pmã > ã > We play Pathfinder. It runs off enhanced D&D 3.5 rules. We've been playingã > that over 10 years now. D&D 4.0 was bad, and 5 seems too far out there. Prã > to the Covid crap we'd get together once a month. We started around 77 alsoã > with the White Box. Fun times.ã > ã > Timã > ããI am not a fan of D&D 4.0, but I don't think it was as bad as people claims itãwas. If they had released it with other name, it would have been remembered asãan ok roleplaying game with heavy skirmishing mechanics. The game only becameãunworkable once your adventures hit parangon tier (10+ lvl). After that point,ãcombats were decided in a couple of turns and everythign after that was a grindãto see how long it took the losers to die.ããD&D 5 reminds me of Castles and Crusaders. The core mechanics are very basicãand feel like a reminiscence of the OSR, but resource and skill management areãNew School. It works extremely well for megadungeon campaigns as long as noãcharacter falls behind the rest of the group by a lot of XP.ãã--ã
gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalkenãã---ã þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FLã