There appears to be a bug in nntpservice.js but it looks too complex for me toãfind it!ããWhen you post a mesage via nntpservice it marks it as moderated. I believe thatãit should only do this if the conference is set to moderated.ããI have one conference set to moderated but all nntp posts are marked moderated.ãIf I remove the moderated conference from SCFG, then all appears to be ok andãposts are posted properly unmoderated again.ããCan anyone duplicate this problem just to make sure it's not me!ããMerlinã---------------------------------------------------------------------------ã Merlin - Sysop of CarSo BBs - telnet://carso.dyndns.orgã---------------------------------------------------------------------------ãã---ã þ Synchronet þ CarSo BBs þ Beverley, UK þ telnet://carso.dyndns.orgã

Merlin wrote:ã> There appears to be a bug in nntpservice.js but it looks too complex for me toã> find it!ã> ã> When you post a mesage via nntpservice it marks it as moderated. I believe thatã> it should only do this if the conference is set to moderated.ã> ã> I have one conference set to moderated but all nntp posts are marked moderated.ã> If I remove the moderated conference from SCFG, then all appears to be ok andã> posts are posted properly unmoderated again.ã> ã> Can anyone duplicate this problem just to make sure it's not me!ããI commented out those lines in my copy... I beleive there are some changesãin sbbs to support this.. re-build from cvs... if you aren't running aãversion built from cvs, then get the nntpservice.js from the 3.10jãpackage...ãã-- ã-----------------------------------------------------------------------ã Michael J. Ryan | ICQ: 4935386ã tracker1(at)theroughnecks(dot)net | AIM/AOL: azTracker1ã Roughneck BBS: | Yahoo: azTracker1ã http://www.theroughnecks.net | MSN: (email address)ã telnet://theroughnecks.net | Trillian: www.trillian.ccãã---ã þ Synchronet þ s3.bbs.us - Synchronet 3 Interface Designsã

Re: nntpserve bug?ã By: Merlin to All on Sun Jan 05 2003 12:57 amãã > There appears to be a bug in nntpservice.js but it looks too complex for me ã > find it!ã > ã > When you post a mesage via nntpservice it marks it as moderated. I believe tã > it should only do this if the conference is set to moderated.ããThe bug is actually in the version of SBBS you're running, not nntpservice.js.ãYou need to go back to the version of nntpserivce.js that came with the versionãof SBBS you're using.ãã digital manã---ã þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.netã

Re: nntpserve bug?ã By: Digital Man to Merlin on Sun Jan 05 2003 02:06 amãã > Re: nntpserve bug?ã > By: Merlin to All on Sun Jan 05 2003 12:57 amã > ã > > There appears to be a bug in nntpservice.js but it looks too complex for ã > > find it!ã > >ã > > When you post a mesage via nntpservice it marks it as moderated. I believã > > it should only do this if the conference is set to moderated.ã > ã > The bug is actually in the version of SBBS you're running, not nntpservice.jã > You need to go back to the version of nntpserivce.js that came with the versã > of SBBS you're using.ããYes! I thought I was using the latest version that I compiled the other day,ãbut it appears that someone (Me!) forgot to copy the newly compiled version toãmy sbbs/exec dir!ã ãMerlinã---------------------------------------------------------------------------ã Merlin - Sysop of CarSo BBs - telnet://carso.dyndns.orgã---------------------------------------------------------------------------ãã---ã þ Synchronet þ CarSo BBs þ Beverley, UK þ telnet://carso.dyndns.orgã

Re: nntpserve bug?ã By: Merlin to Digital Man on Sun Jan 05 2003 02:14 pmãã > Re: nntpserve bug?ã > By: Digital Man to Merlin on Suã > ã > > Re: nntpserve bug?ã > > By: Merlin to All on Sun Jan 05 2003 12:57 amã > >ã > > > There appears to be a bug in nntpservice.js but it looks too complex fã > > > find it!ã > > >ã > > > When you post a mesage via nntpservice it marks it as moderated. I belã > > > it should only do this if the conference is set to moderated.ã > >ã > > The bug is actually in the version of SBBS you're running, not nntpservicã > > You need to go back to the version of nntpserivce.js that came with the vã > > of SBBS you're using.ã > ã > Yes! I thought I was using the latest version that I compiled the other day,ã > but it appears that someone (Me!) forgot to copy the newly compiled version ã > my sbbs/exec dir!ã > ã > Merlinã > -------------------------------------------------------------------ã > Merlin - Sysop of CarSo BBs - telnã > -------------------------------------------------------------------ã > ããHA! been there, done that...ããã"Champagne for my real friends, and real pain for my sham friends"ããThree Stooges Gentlemens Club - tsgc.dyndns.org - Las Vegas, Nvãã---ã þ Synchronet þ Three Stooges Gentlemens Club - Las Vegas, Nvã

Re: nntpserve bug?ã By: Corey to Merlin on Sun Jan 05 2003 08:03 amãã > "Champagne for my real friends, and real pain for my sham friends"ããIs it just me, or does anyone else find taglines a source of great wisdom?...ããI was wondering... Are there any plans to excise Baja as a possible way to addãmods and shells, or is it allways going to stick around?ããC:\WINDOWS C:\WINdOWS\RUN C:\WINdOWS\RUN\SLOWããã---ã þ Synchronet þ IQ Land - Dead genius slowly striving to enter the land of the livingã

Re: nntpserve bug?ã By: Prime to Corey on Wed Jun 25 2003 11:15 pmãã > > "Champagne for my real friends, and real pain for my sham friends"ã > ã > Is it just me, or does anyone else find taglines a source of great wisdom?..ã > ã > I was wondering... Are there any plans to excise Baja as a possible way to aã > mods and shells, or is it allways going to stick around?ããI don't know about "always", but there is currently no foreseeable reason toãremove Baja support.ãã digital manããSnapple "Real Fact" #33:ãTermites eat through wood two times faster when listening to rock music!ã---ã þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.netã

Re: nntpserve bug?ã By: Prime to Corey on Wed Jun 25 2003 23:15:00ãã > I was wondering... Are there any plans to excise Baja as a possible way to aã > mods and shells, or is it allways going to stick around?ããWhen the JS support is finally complete ( imagine the need for BAJA will witherãaway. Perhaps eventually it will be removed from the codebase (as was dial-upãsupport). But I would expect (and advise) that a lengthy period pass beforeãthat happen. ããOf course DM may tell you his precise plans...ãã---ã þ Synchronet þ Where we BAJA Rob into writing our modules. The ANJO BBSã

Angus wrote:ã> > I was wondering... Are there any plans to excise Baja as a possibleã> > way to a mods and shells, or is it allways going to stick around?ã> ã> When the JS support is finally complete ( imagine the need for BAJAã> will wither away. Perhaps eventually it will be removed from the codebaseã> (as was dial-up support). But I would expect (and advise) that a lengthyã> period pass before that happen. ã> ã> Of course DM may tell you his precise plans...ããAFAIK rob doesn't intend on removing baja support... but I personally don'tãsee it really advancing at all.. pretty much anything new will be done inãJS... beyond that, JS is pretty complete, my board runs 99.99% JS, withãthe only exception being the small stub to load my command shell.ããIn the S3 shell, there are still a couple of things in the file sectionãthat will launch baja commands on the fly, simply because I am not sureãhow they are supposed to work in js, or that they work in js properly.ããarrays, and oo-code are probably the two biggest reasons imho to jumpãto js... (finally getting some time to work on my bbs this weekend.)ãmay come up with something, or some things that are new. :)ãã-- ãMichael J. Ryan - tracker1(at)theroughnecks(dot)net - www.theroughnecks.netãicq: 4935386 - AIM/AOL: azTracker1 - Y!: azTracker1 - MSN/Win: (email)ãã---ã þ Synchronet þ theroughnecks.net, where the men are men, and the women like itã