• SM_SYSSTAT

    From Hax0r@VERT/HAX0RQWK to All on Tue Aug 8 11:46:00 2000
    Ok, if I excute the following in a baja module, i as the sysop should be keptãtrack of in the log etc -- correct?ããor _sys_mic _SM_SYSSTATããcorrect?ãã---ã þ Synchronet þ hax0r's palace - unknown-realm.dynip.com - you've been hax0r'dã
  • From Digital Man@VERT to Hax0r on Thu Aug 10 02:43:22 2000
    RE: SM_SYSSTATãBY: Hax0r to All on Tue Aug 08 2000 06:46 pmãã > Ok, if I excute the following in a baja module, i as the sysop should be kepã > track of in the log etc -- correct?ããWhich log? If you're talking about the detailed log, all remote (includingãtelnet sessions are logged this way).ãã > or _sys_mic _SM_SYSSTATã > ã > correct?ããThis will include the sysop's activity in the system statistics and the sysop'sãlogin/offs in the "last few callers" list.ããBut why do it via Baja? This same option is togglable in SCFG.ããRobã---ã þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.netã
  • From Hax0r@VERT/HAX0RQWK to Digital Man on Thu Aug 10 15:19:00 2000
    RE: SM_SYSSTATãBY: Digital Man to Hax0r on Thu Aug 10 2000 09:43 amãã > > or _sys_mic _SM_SYSSTATã > >ã > > correct?ã > ã > This will include the sysop's activity in the system statistics and the sysoã > login/offs in the "last few callers" list.ã > ã > But why do it via Baja? This same option is togglable in SCFG.ããThe reason I am doing it this way is because the SCFG setting doesnt notãdifferentiate amongst users with access level greater than 90. I have a userãwith access level 90 on my board (besides myself) and I would like themãincluded in the daily callers and system logon/off stats, but not myself. ãBasically, I was going to have a compare statement in my LOGON module to checkãto see if the user# of the person logged in is <> to 1..... if this was theãcase, then or _sys_misc _SM_SYSSTAT. At first, I thought that my compare wasãhosed up -- so I just tried that line by itself, but it still did not includeãme in the LFC and logon stats.ããHeh -- whats up with it?ãã---ã þ Synchronet þ hax0r's palace - unknown-realm.dynip.com - you've been hax0r'dã
  • From Digital Man@VERT to Hax0r on Fri Aug 11 04:51:49 2000
    RE: SM_SYSSTATãBY: Hax0r to Digital Man on Thu Aug 10 2000 10:19 pmãã > > > or _sys_mic _SM_SYSSTATã > > >ã > > > correct?ã > >ã > > This will include the sysop's activity in the system statistics and the sã > > login/offs in the "last few callers" list.ã > >ã > > But why do it via Baja? This same option is togglable in SCFG.ã > ã > The reason I am doing it this way is because the SCFG setting doesnt notã > differentiate amongst users with access level greater than 90. I have a useã > with access level 90 on my board (besides myself) and I would like themã > included in the daily callers and system logon/off stats, but not myself.ã > Basically, I was going to have a compare statement in my LOGON module to cheã > to see if the user# of the person logged in is <> to 1..... if this was theã > case, then or _sys_misc _SM_SYSSTAT. At first, I thought that my compare waã > hosed up -- so I just tried that line by itself, but it still did not includã > me in the LFC and logon stats.ã > ã > Heh -- whats up with it?ããSounds like you're not doing it soon enough in the login sequence.ããRobã---ã þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.netã
  • From PistolGrip@VERT/WASTELND to Hax0r on Fri Aug 11 08:53:00 2000
    RE: SM_SYSSTATãBY: Digital Man to Hax0r on Fri Aug 11 2000 11:51 amãã > Sounds like you're not doing it soon enough in the login sequence.ããYou might try it in the LOGIN module instead of LOGON.ããPistolGripããã---ã þ Synchronet þ WasteLand BBS þ telnet://wasteland.darktech.org ã
  • From Hax0r@VERT/HAX0RQWK to Digital Man on Fri Aug 11 13:05:00 2000
    RE: SM_SYSSTATãBY: Digital Man to Hax0r on Fri Aug 11 2000 11:51 amãã > > > > or _sys_mic _SM_SYSSTATã > > > >ã > > > > correct?ã > Sounds like you're not doing it soon enough in the login sequence.ããWell, I had it in the LOGON.SRC file, originally at the top (as one of theãfirst lines) and then in the bottom -- how much "sooner" can i get :)ããWell, I tried it as the *very* first line of code in LOGIN.SRC (after theãinclude of SBBS.DEFs.... and it STILL did not do what it was supposed to --ãwhats up with that?ãã---ã þ Synchronet þ hax0r's palace - unknown-realm.dynip.com - you've been hax0r'dã
  • From PistolGrip@VERT/WASTELND to Hax0r on Fri Aug 11 15:21:00 2000
    RE: SM_SYSSTATãBY: Hax0r to Digital Man on Fri Aug 11 2000 08:05 pmãã > Well, I tried it as the *very* first line of code in LOGIN.SRC (after theã > include of SBBS.DEFs.... and it STILL did not do what it was supposed to --ã > whats up with that?ããI know it's stupid, but can you post the line(s) of code you are using to tryãand do this? ããPistolGripããã---ã þ Synchronet þ WasteLand BBS þ telnet://wasteland.darktech.org ã
  • From Hax0r@VERT/HAX0RQWK to PistolGrip on Sat Aug 12 19:52:00 2000
    RE: SM_SYSSTATãBY: PistolGrip to Hax0r on Fri Aug 11 2000 10:21 pmãã > I know it's stupid, but can you post the line(s) of code you are using to trã > and do this?ãã# LOGIN.SRCã!include sbbsdefs.incãor _sys_misc SM_SYSSTATããã**rest of LOGIN Process hereããWhich incidentally *will* include everyone EXCEPT #1 in the stats w/ LVL>90. ãI'm not sure if this is by design, but is definately cool if you code baja andãtend to logon/off alot.ããI originally thought that it was not working as it should, but it turns outãthat I was testing it with user account #1 lvl 99, and was not showing up inãthe lfc and daily callers logs..... however user account #3 w/ Lvl 95 shows upãconsistently with that line in there.ãã---ã þ Synchronet þ hax0r's palace - unknown-realm.dynip.com - you've been hax0r'dã