• Packet 2.2

    From deon@VERT/ALTERANT to Digital Man on Sun Jun 25 12:09:47 2023
    Hey DM,ããIve been playing with packet formats, and I cant seem to get a good 2.2 packet.ãã649783eb-997-2.2.pktã00000000 04 00 e5 03 e7 07 05 00 19 00 0a 00 01 00 2b 00 |..............+.|ã00000010 00 00 02 00 01 00 03 00 ff 03 4c 00 00 00 00 00 |..........L.....|ã00000020 35 00 0a 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |5...............|ã00000030 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |..........|ããFor the domain part 0x26 and 0x2e, I was expecting "private" for the domain, not nulls.ããAny ideas why I'm getting nulls?ããã...ëîåïãã---ã þ Synchronet þ AnsiTEX bringing back videotex but with ANSIã
  • From deon@VERT/ALTERANT to Digital Man on Sun Jun 25 20:57:59 2023
    Re: Packet 2.2ã By: deon to Digital Man on Sun Jun 25 2023 12:09 pmãã > For the domain part 0x26 and 0x2e, I was expecting "private" for the domain,ã > not nulls.ã >ã > Any ideas why I'm getting nulls?ããMy bad. I think I may have set it to v2 packet, not 2.2, I'll try again.ããã...ëîåïãã---ã þ Synchronet þ AnsiTEX bringing back videotex but with ANSIã
  • From deon@VERT/ALTERANT to Digital Man on Sun Jun 25 21:17:06 2023
    Re: Packet 2.2ã By: deon to Digital Man on Sun Jun 25 2023 08:57 pmããOK, I think I found a different problem with packet 2.2 format...ããsbbsecho.log shows: (ie: packet to 3/997 - as defined - not to a point)ãã===ã2023-06-25 20:59:39 Sending packet (/opt/sbbs/temp/sbbsecho/64981e1f.pkt, 0.5KB) from 10:1/4 to 10:3/997ã2023-06-25 20:59:39 File (../fido/outbound.00a/64981e1f.pkt, 0.5KB) for 10:3/997 added to BSO/FLO file: ../fido/outbound.00a/000303e5.hloã===ããHowever packet dump says it is going to 3/997.5:ãã===ãroot@alterant:outbound.00a# pktdump 64981e1f.pktãpktdump rev 1.18 - Dump FidoNet PacketsããOpening 64981e1f.pktã64981e1f.pkt Packet Type 2.2 (prod: FF, rev: 3) from 10:1/4@private to 10:3/997.5@privateã===ããHexdump of the packet shows:ãã===ã[root@a-2-1 outbound.00a]# hexdump -Cn 58 64981e1f.pktã00000000 04 00 e5 03 e7 07 05 00 19 00 14 00 3b 00 27 00 |............;.'.|ã00000010 02 00 02 00 01 00 03 00 ff 03 4c 00 00 00 00 00 |..........L.....|ã00000020 00 00 0a 00 0a 00 70 72 69 76 61 74 65 00 70 72 |......private.pr|ã00000030 69 76 61 74 65 00 00 00 00 00 |ivate.....|ã===ããIndeed:ã 0x04 should be zero (instead shows 2023 - Year?)ã 0x06 should be zero (instead shows 05 - Month?)ã 0x08 should be zero (? - reserved) but is probably the rest of the date from a type 2 packet?)ããã...ëîåïãã---ã þ Synchronet þ AnsiTEX bringing back videotex but with ANSIã
  • From Digital Man@VERT to deon on Mon Jun 26 11:04:23 2023
    Re: Packet 2.2ã By: deon to Digital Man on Sun Jun 25 2023 09:17 pmãã > OK, I think I found a different problem with packet 2.2 format...ããThanks for the report! I just committed a fix to the SBBSecho type 2.2 packet header generation. Give that a try and let me know. Thanks,ã-- ã digital man (rob)ããRush quote #33:ãWith the heart and mind united in a single, perfect sphereãNorco, CA WX: 71.6øF, 55.0% humidity, 0 mph E wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrsã---ã þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.netã
  • From deon@VERT/ALTERANT to Digital Man on Tue Jun 27 04:49:09 2023
    Re: Packet 2.2ã By: deon to Digital Man on Sun Jun 25 2023 09:17 pmãã > However packet dump says it is going to 3/997.5:ã >ã > ===ã > root@alterant:outbound.00a# pktdump 64981e1f.pktã > pktdump rev 1.18 - Dump FidoNet Packetsã >ã > Opening 64981e1f.pktã > 64981e1f.pkt Packet Type 2.2 (prod: FF, rev: 3) from 10:1/4@private toã > 10:3/997.5@privateã > ===ã >ã > Hexdump of the packet shows:ã >ã > ===ã > [root@a-2-1 outbound.00a]# hexdump -Cn 58 64981e1f.pktã >00000000 04 00 e5 03 e7 07 05 00 19 00 14 00 3b 00 27 00 |............;.'.|ã >00000010 02 00 02 00 01 00 03 00 ff 03 4c 00 00 00 00ããHowdy,ãã(I know you've committed a fix to this.)ããOn a similiar topic, I thought pktdump should have reported that the packet was from 10:1/4.2023@private ?ãããã...ëîåïãã---ã þ Synchronet þ AnsiTEX bringing back videotex but with ANSIã
  • From Digital Man@VERT to deon on Mon Jun 26 16:25:46 2023
    Re: Packet 2.2ã By: deon to Digital Man on Tue Jun 27 2023 04:49 amãã > On a similiar topic, I thought pktdump should have reported that the packetã > was from 10:1/4.2023@private ?ããThanks - that should be fixed now too! :-)ã-- ã digital man (rob)ããSynchronet "Real Fact" #50:ãJAM and Squish were considered before developing Synchronet Message Base formatãNorco, CA WX: 79.7øF, 37.0% humidity, 13 mph SSW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrsã---ã þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.netã