I wonder whether it would be a worthwhile endeavor to re-write Usurper as a Javascript door for Sync, much like how LORD, LORD2, and TW2 have been done. From looking at the source on Github, it seems like it would be daunting but doable. Could probably make fixes and improvements along the way -- I'm sure most sysops familiar with Usurper would agree that its bugginess is legendary.ããSo, just to gauge interest, would any sysops run a JS version of Usurper if one were available?ããOr, by chance, is such a project already being worked on by someone?ãã---ã þ Synchronet þ Seek mundanity's cure | conchaos.synchro.net | ConstructiveChaos BBSã

Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: Codefenix to All on Sun Jul 12 2020 11:21:43ãã Co> I wonder whether it would be a worthwhile endeavor to re-write Usurper asã Co> So, just to gauge interest, would any sysops run a JS version of Usurperã Co> if one were available? ã Co> Or, by chance, is such a project already being worked on by someone?ããSource code is already available on git, and already compiles native forãwindows, dos, and Linux. No point in rewriting it. You could fork it, orãdevelop something similar though. If you do something interesting, plenty ofãfolks will try it out something new given there's not a lot of new door gamesãcoming out these days.ããhttps://github.com/rickparrish/Usurperã---ãUnderminerãThe Undermine BBS - bbs.undermine.ca:423ãFidonet: 1:342/17ã---ã þ Synchronet þ The Undermine - bbs.undermine.caã

Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: Underminer to Codefenix on Sun Jul 12 2020 06:01 pmãã > Source code is already available on git, and already compiles native forã > windows, dos, and Linux. No point in rewriting it. You could fork it, orã > develop something similar though. If you do something interesting, plenty ofã > folks will try it out something new given there's not a lot of new doorã > games coming out these days.ããI would definitely run Usurper.js, but I haven't even gotten around to setting up the original because of the bugs. That being said, it was probably my favorite all time door.ãã---TLMãã---ã þ Synchronet þ Nite Eyes BBS - To make people happy about my tagline everywhere...ã

Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: The Lizard Master to Underminer on Mon Jul 13 2020 10:20 amãã > I would definitely run Usurper.js, but I haven't even gotten around to settiã > up the original because of the bugs. That being said, it was probably myã > favorite all time door.ãããusurper may have a few bugs, but nothing serious. isnt the only one a problemãwith the score file?ã---ã þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::ã

El 12/7/20 a las 12:21, Codefenix escribió:

I wonder whether it would be a worthwhile endeavor to re-write Usurper as a Javascript door for Sync, much like how LORD, LORD2, and TW2 have been done. From looking at the source on Github, it seems like it would be daunting but doable. Could probably make fixes and improvements along the way -- I'm sure most sysops familiar with Usurper would agree that its bugginess is legendary.

So, just to gauge interest, would any sysops run a JS version of Usurper if one were available?

Or, by chance, is such a project already being worked on by someone?

---
� Synchronet � Seek mundanity's cure | conchaos.synchro.net | ConstructiveChaos BBS

I vote for js port, and if you port them, please think use some kind of i18n/locales support, if you can insolate all strings, can be easy
translated to anpther language.

I like to play it in Spanish.

---
ï¿­ Synchronet ï¿­ Dock Sud BBS TLD 24 HS - bbs.docksud.com.ar

Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: MRO to The Lizard Master on Mon Jul 13 2020 17:30:26ãã MR> usurper may have a few bugs, but nothing serious. isnt the only one aã MR> problem with the score file?ããThat's the only one I've ever personally run into, and the only one I've everãheard actively complained about. I'm sure there's a few other small ones, butãafaik nothing game breaking...ã---ãUnderminerãThe Undermine BBS - bbs.undermine.ca:423ãFidonet: 1:342/17ã---ã þ Synchronet þ The Undermine - bbs.undermine.caã

On 7/12/2020 11:21 AM, Codefenix wrote:

I wonder whether it would be a worthwhile endeavor to re-write Usurper as a Javascript door for Sync, much like how LORD, LORD2, and TW2 have been done. From looking at the source on Github, it seems like it would be daunting but doable. Could probably make fixes and improvements along the way -- I'm sure most sysops familiar with Usurper would agree that its bugginess is legendary.

So, just to gauge interest, would any sysops run a JS version of Usurper if one were available?

Or, by chance, is such a project already being worked on by someone?

Step 1: Copy Deuce's LORD game in CVS.
Step 2: Find/Replace "Legend of the Red Dragon" with "Usurper"
Step 3: EnjoY your JS-Usurper game!

-Mindless Automaton
---
þ Synchronet þ * Origin: Eldritch Clockwork BBS - eldritchclockwork.net

Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: Mindless Automaton to Codefenix on Thu Jul 16 2020 04:46 pmãã MA> On 7/12/2020 11:21 AM, Codefenix wrote:ã >> I wonder whether it would be a worthwhile endeavor to re-write Usurperã >> as a Javascript door for Sync, much like how LORD, LORD2, and TW2 haveã >> been done. From looking at the source on Github, it seems like itã >> would be daunting but doable. Could probably make fixes andã >> improvements along the way -- I'm sure most sysops familiar withã >> Usurper would agree that its bugginess is legendary.ãããi wouldnt say usurper's bugginess is legendary. exitilus is legendary.ããusurper had a maint that took forever because of all the npcs. that problemãhas been fixed. now there's a score file bug that one guy is complaining about.ãi'm not even sure if that bug exists.ãããcreate a list of pros and cons.ã---ã þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::ã

Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: MRO to all on Fri Jul 17 2020 20:11:59ãã MR> i wouldnt say usurper's bugginess is legendary. exitilus is legendary.ããAgreed. I haven't had major issues with Usurper in YEARS. ããExitilus depends on version. I honestly don't know why I see so many boardsãrunnint exit 3.20 when half of it just doesn't work at all. 2.05 works great asãlong as you make sure paths are set right, and ensure nobody can enter inãmulti-user.ã---ãUnderminerãThe Undermine BBS - bbs.undermine.ca:423ãFidonet: 1:342/17ã---ã þ Synchronet þ The Undermine - bbs.undermine.caã

Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: Underminer to MRO on Fri Jul 17 2020 09:55 pmãã Un> Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã Un> By: MRO to all on Fri Jul 17 2020 20:11:59ãã MR>> i wouldnt say usurper's bugginess is legendary. exitilus isã MR>> legendary. ãã Un> Agreed. I haven't had major issues with Usurper in YEARS. ãã Un> Exitilus depends on version. I honestly don't know why I see so manyã Un> boards runnint exit 3.20 when half of it just doesn't work at all. 2.05ã Un> works great as long as you make sure paths are set right, and ensureã Un> nobody can enter in multi-user.ããwell i run a bbs that used to be a big gaming bbs. people would ask for oneãversion or the other. there were certainly exploits that would mess up theãdata files.ã---ã þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::ã

Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: MRO to Underminer on Sat Jul 18 2020 01:14 amãã > Un> Agreed. I haven't had major issues with Usurper in YEARS.ããThanks for the feedback everyone. Based on the responses it's clear that most feel that a re-write of Usurper isn't worth doing.ãã---ã þ Synchronet þ Seek mundanity's cure | conchaos.synchro.net | ConstructiveChaos BBSã

Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: Codefenix to All on Sun Jul 12 2020 11:21 amãã Co> So, just to gauge interest, would any sysops run a JS version of Usurperã Co> if one were available?ããI would run it. Usurper is one of my favorite games. I'm currently running an older version of it because the most recent version doesn't run well under dosemu. And the linux binary doesn't work at all. ããImmortalãã... My other vehicle is a Galaxy Class Starship ...ãã---ã þ Synchronet þ Immortal's Domainã

Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: Mindless Automaton to Codefenix on Thu Jul 16 2020 04:46 pmãã MA> Step 1: Copy Deuce's LORD game in CVS.ã MA> Step 2: Find/Replace "Legend of the Red Dragon" with "Usurper"ã MA> Step 3: EnjoY your JS-Usurper game!ããIt's not even close to being the same game. lolããImmortalãã... No one wants war. Kirk, Errand of Mercy, stardate 3201.7.ãã---ã þ Synchronet þ Immortal's Domainã

Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: Immortal to Codefenix on Sun Jul 19 2020 07:28 pmãã Im> Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã Im> By: Codefenix to All on Sun Jul 12 2020 11:21 amãã Co>> So, just to gauge interest, would any sysops run a JS version ofã Co>> Usurper if one were available?ãã Im> I would run it. Usurper is one of my favorite games. I'm currently runningã Im> an older version of it because the most recent version doesn't run wellã Im> under dosemu. And the linux binary doesn't work at all. ããdid you tell the developer about these problems?ã---ã þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::ã

Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: Immortal to Mindless Automaton on Sun Jul 19 2020 07:30 pmãã Im> Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã Im> By: Mindless Automaton to Codefenix on Thu Jul 16 2020 04:46 pmãã MA>> Step 1: Copy Deuce's LORD game in CVS.ã MA>> Step 2: Find/Replace "Legend of the Red Dragon" with "Usurper"ã MA>> Step 3: EnjoY your JS-Usurper game!ãã Im> It's not even close to being the same game. lolããjs lord and real lord arent even closeã---ã þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::ã

Immortal wrote to Codefenix <=-ãã Co> So, just to gauge interest, would any sysops run a JS version of Usurperã Co> if one were available?ãã Im> I would run it. Usurper is one of my favorite games. I'mã Im> currently running an older version of it because the most recentã Im> version doesn't run well under dosemu.ããWhat's the most recent version? I am running 0.24 under dosemu ãand it seems to be fine.ãããã... Internal Error: The system has been taken over by sheep at line 19960ã--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52ã þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FLã

Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: MRO to Immortal on Mon Jul 20 2020 12:44 amãã > Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã > By: Immortal to Mindless Automaton on Sun Jul 19 2020 07:30 pmã >ã > Im> Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã > Im> By: Mindless Automaton to Codefenix on Thu Jul 16 2020 04:46 pmã >ã > MA>> Step 1: Copy Deuce's LORD game in CVS.ã > MA>> Step 2: Find/Replace "Legend of the Red Dragon" with "Usurper"ã > MA>> Step 3: EnjoY your JS-Usurper game!ã >ã > Im> It's not even close to being the same game. lolã >ã > js lord and real lord arent even closeããWe're talking about the JavaScript port of LORD for Synchronet (and jsdoor).ãPerhaps you're talking about some *other* "js lord" thing.ãã digital manããSynchronet/BBS Terminology Definition #43:ãIP = Internet ProtocolãNorco, CA WX: 83.2øF, 49.0% humidity, 8 mph NNE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrsã---ã þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.netã

Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: MRO to Immortal on Mon Jul 20 2020 12:44 amãã Im>> I would run it. Usurper is one of my favorite games. I'm currentlyã Im>> running an older version of it because the most recent versionã Im>> doesn't run well under dosemu. And the linux binary doesn't work atã Im>> all. ãã MR> did you tell the developer about these problems?ããI sent him a few emails and never got a response. I think with the linux binary it would run locally but not as a door. ããImmortalãã... A seeming ignorance is often a most necessary part of worldly knowledge.ãã---ã þ Synchronet þ Immortal's Domainã

Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: Gamgee to Immortal on Mon Jul 20 2020 07:32 amãã Ga> What's the most recent version? I am running 0.24 under dosemu ã Ga> and it seems to be fine.ããThere is one on github, whatever version that is. I'm running 0.23d at the moment.ããImmortalãã... I only know two tunes. One is 'Rule Brittania' -- and the other isn't.ãã---ã þ Synchronet þ Immortal's Domainã

Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: Digital Man to MRO on Mon Jul 20 2020 12:45 pmãã > MA>>> Step 1: Copy Deuce's LORD game in CVS.ã > MA>>> Step 2: Find/Replace "Legend of the Red Dragon" with "Usurper"ã > MA>>> Step 3: EnjoY your JS-Usurper game!ãã > Im>> It's not even close to being the same game. lolãã >> js lord and real lord arent even closeãã DM> We're talking about the JavaScript port of LORD for Synchronet (andã DM> jsdoor). Perhaps you're talking about some *other* "js lord" thing.ãããi'm talking about the javascript lord game. ããis it a port or just a rewrite? doesnt seem to use the same datafiles and isnt entirely the same.ã---ã þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::ã

Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: Immortal to MRO on Mon Jul 20 2020 06:37 pmãã Im> Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã Im> By: MRO to Immortal on Mon Jul 20 2020 12:44 amãã Im>>> I would run it. Usurper is one of my favorite games. I'm currentlyã Im>>> running an older version of it because the most recent versionã Im>>> doesn't run well under dosemu. And the linux binary doesn't work atã Im>>> all. ãã MR>> did you tell the developer about these problems?ãã Im> I sent him a few emails and never got a response. I think with the linuxã Im> binary it would run locally but not as a door. ãã Im> Immortalãããi heard people say that he doesnt respond but he always replies to me. ãmaybe his response is in your spam folder?ã---ã þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::ã

Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: MRO to Digital Man on Mon Jul 20 2020 09:40 pmãã > Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã > By: Digital Man to MRO on Mon Jul 20 2020 12:45 pmã >ã > > MA>>> Step 1: Copy Deuce's LORD game in CVS.ã > > MA>>> Step 2: Find/Replace "Legend of the Red Dragon" with "Usurper"ã > > MA>>> Step 3: EnjoY your JS-Usurper game!ã >ã > > Im>> It's not even close to being the same game. lolã >ã > >> js lord and real lord arent even closeã >ã > DM> We're talking about the JavaScript port of LORD for Synchronet (andã > DM> jsdoor). Perhaps you're talking about some *other* "js lord" thing.ã >ã >ã > i'm talking about the javascript lord game.ããSounds like maybe there is more than one?ãã > is it a port or just a rewrite?ããThe one I'm referring to is a port.ãã > doesnt seem to use the same datafiles andã > isnt entirely the same.ããThe one I'm referring to uses the same datafiles and is pretty much entirely the same.ãã digital manããSling Blade quote #2:ãKarl (re: killing Doyle): I hit him two good whacks in the head with it.ãNorco, CA WX: 73.6øF, 63.0% humidity, 7 mph NNE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrsã---ã þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.netã

Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: Immortal to MRO on Mon Jul 20 2020 06:37 pmãã Im> I sent him a few emails and never got a response. I think with the linuxã Im> binary it would run locally but not as a door. ã Im> ImmortalããYeah... That's even listed in the isntall instructions on his site. You just have to set Synch or Mystic to intercept standard i/o and away you go. That's how I have it setup here.ã---ãUnderminerãThe Undermine BBS - bbs.undermine.ca:423ãFidonet: 1:342/17ã---ã þ Synchronet þ The Undermine - bbs.undermine.ca:423ã

Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: Digital Man to MRO on Mon Jul 20 2020 08:04 pmãã > >>> js lord and real lord arent even closeãã > DM>> We're talking about the JavaScript port of LORD for Synchronetã > DM>> (and jsdoor). Perhaps you're talking about some *other* "js lord"ã > DM>> thing. ãã >> i'm talking about the javascript lord game.ãã >> is it a port or just a rewrite?ãã DM> The one I'm referring to is a port.ãã >> doesnt seem to use the same datafiles andã >> isnt entirely the same.ãã DM> The one I'm referring to uses the same datafiles and is pretty muchã DM> entirely the same. ããA while ago on FSXNet, I remember hearing about another LORD port, but I think that was written in Python for Mystic. I could be wrong though. But that's the only other recent LORD port I know of.ããNightfoxãã---ã þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.comã

Immortal wrote to Gamgee <=-ãã Ga> What's the most recent version? I am running 0.24 under dosemuã Ga> and it seems to be fine.ãã Im> There is one on github, whatever version that is. I'm runningã Im> 0.23d at the moment.ããThere are multiple versions/branches from what I can see on ãGithub. All are quite a bit older than the DOS version 0.24. Not ãsure why anyone would use those (or anything other than the ã(apparently) last "real" version which is 0.24). <SHRUG>ãããã... He does the work of 3 Men...Moe, Larry & Curlyã--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52ã þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FLã

Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: Digital Man to MRO on Mon Jul 20 2020 08:04 pmãã > DM>> We're talking about the JavaScript port of LORD for Synchronetã > DM>> (and jsdoor). Perhaps you're talking about some *other* "js lord"ã > DM>> thing. ãããi see sbbs/xtrn/lord in the cvsããit has some of the same types of files, but then other ones have a .lrd extension and changes to the game.ããand it says in the docs it's a rewrite. so is it an actual port or a rewrite?ã---ã þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::ã

Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: Nightfox to Digital Man on Mon Jul 20 2020 09:00 pmããã Ni> A while ago on FSXNet, I remember hearing about another LORD port, but Iã Ni> think that was written in Python for Mystic. I could be wrong though. Butã Ni> that's the only other recent LORD port I know of.ãããwell a port would be a conversion using the original sourcecode, right?ãthat would be illegal and metrogameport would not like that.ã---ã þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::ã

Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: MRO to Nightfox on Tue Jul 21 2020 06:01 pmãã Ni>> A while ago on FSXNet, I remember hearing about another LORD port,ã Ni>> but I think that was written in Python for Mystic. I could be wrongã Ni>> though. But that's the only other recent LORD port I know of.ãã MR> well a port would be a conversion using the original sourcecode, right?ã MR> that would be illegal and metrogameport would not like that.ããIt's either a port or written from scratch. I don't really know. It's probably written from scratch.ããNightfoxãã---ã þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.comã

Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: Underminer to Immortal on Mon Jul 20 2020 08:48 pmãã Un> Yeah... That's even listed in the isntall instructions on his site. Youã Un> just have to set Synch or Mystic to intercept standard i/o and away youã Un> go. That's how I have it setup here.ããI dunno. Just tried again and it doesn't work. Identical config from what is on the website. Under socket I/O it loads but nothing is sent across the terminal. Under STDIO standard it loads over the terminal but asks for a username for local login.ããImmortalãã... Never try to out-stubborn a cat.ãã---ã þ Synchronet þ Immortal's Domainã

Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: MRO to Digital Man on Tue Jul 21 2020 05:59 pmãã > Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã > By: Digital Man to MRO on Mon Jul 20 2020 08:04 pmã >ã > > DM>> We're talking about the JavaScript port of LORD for Synchronetã > > DM>> (and jsdoor). Perhaps you're talking about some *other* "js lord"ã > > DM>> thing.ã >ã >ã > i see sbbs/xtrn/lord in the cvsã >ã > it has some of the same types of files, but then other ones have a .lrdã > extension and changes to the game.ã >ã > and it says in the docs it's a rewrite. so is it an actual port or aã > rewrite?ããIt's a port.ããã digital manããSynchronet "Real Fact" #54:ãThe Synchronet source code consists of over 500,000 lines of C and C++.ãNorco, CA WX: 80.9øF, 51.0% humidity, 10 mph ENE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrsã---ã þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.netã

Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: Digital Man to MRO on Fri Jul 24 2020 02:22 pmãã >> i see sbbs/xtrn/lord in the cvsãã >> it has some of the same types of files, but then other ones have aã >> .lrd extension and changes to the game.ãã >> and it says in the docs it's a rewrite. so is it an actual port or aã >> rewrite?ãã DM> It's a port.ãããso lord 5 is made using the source code from lord 4.x for dos?ã---ã þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::ã

Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: MRO to Digital Man on Sat Jul 25 2020 04:51 pmãã > Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã > By: Digital Man to MRO on Fri Jul 24 2020 02:22 pmã >ã > >> i see sbbs/xtrn/lord in the cvsã >ã > >> it has some of the same types of files, but then other ones have aã > >> .lrd extension and changes to the game.ã >ã > >> and it says in the docs it's a rewrite. so is it an actual port or aã > >> rewrite?ã >ã > DM> It's a port.ã >ã >ã > so lord 5 is made using the source code from lord 4.x for dos?ããI'm not sure what lord 5 is. The JavaScript version of LORD for Synchronet was ported from the LORD v4 Pascal source code.ãã digital manããThis Is Spinal Tap quote #21:ãSo when you're playing you feel like a preserved moose on stage?ãNorco, CA WX: 72.9øF, 67.0% humidity, 4 mph SE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrsã---ã þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.netã

Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: Digital Man to MRO on Sun Jul 26 2020 07:30 pmããã > >>> and it says in the docs it's a rewrite. so is it an actual port orã > >>> a rewrite?ãã > DM>> It's a port.ããã >> so lord 5 is made using the source code from lord 4.x for dos?ãã DM> I'm not sure what lord 5 is. The JavaScript version of LORD for Synchronetã DM> was ported from the LORD v4 Pascal source code.ããããso did you write the docs or did someone write the docs using your name?ããbecause in the docs it says it's a rewrite of classic lord. here you say it's ported from the pascal source.ããand it says lord 5.00 js in the docs and here you say you dont know what lord 5 is.ããhttps://i.imgur.com/RrW6Qvm.pngã---ã þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::ã

Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: MRO to Digital Man on Sun Jul 26 2020 10:30 pmãã > Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã > By: Digital Man to MRO on Sun Jul 26 2020 07:30 pmã >ã >ã > > >>> and it says in the docs it's a rewrite. so is it an actual port orã > > >>> a rewrite?ã >ã > > DM>> It's a port.ã >ã >ã > >> so lord 5 is made using the source code from lord 4.x for dos?ã >ã > DM> I'm not sure what lord 5 is. The JavaScript version of LORD forã > DM> Synchronet was ported from the LORD v4 Pascal source code.ã >ã >ã >ã > so did you write the docs or did someone write the docs using your name?ããDeuce wrote it:ãhttps://imgur.com/a/FVbS3Bnãã > because in the docs it says it's a rewrite of classic lord. here you sayã > it's ported from the pascal source.ããIt was in fact ported from the Pascal Source of LORD v4.x.ãã > and it says lord 5.00 js in the docs and here you say you dont know whatã > lord 5 is.ã >ã > https://i.imgur.com/RrW6Qvm.pngããApparently Deuce had the idea to dub it version 5 and some point. I don't think that idea stuck.ãã digital manããSling Blade quote #9:ãDoyle Hargraves: Morris here is a modern-day poet, kinda like in olden times.ãNorco, CA WX: 94.7øF, 31.0% humidity, 6 mph ENE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrsã---ã þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.netã

Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: Digital Man to MRO on Sat Aug 01 2020 12:37 pmãã >> because in the docs it says it's a rewrite of classic lord. here youã >> say it's ported from the pascal source.ãã DM> It was in fact ported from the Pascal Source of LORD v4.x.ãããokay i hope the gameport guy is okay with that.ã---ã þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::ã

Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: MRO to Digital Man on Sat Aug 01 2020 09:25 pmãã > Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã > By: Digital Man to MRO on Sat Aug 01 2020 12:37 pmã >ã > >> because in the docs it says it's a rewrite of classic lord. here youã > >> say it's ported from the pascal source.ã >ã > DM> It was in fact ported from the Pascal Source of LORD v4.x.ã >ã >ã > okay i hope the gameport guy is okay with that.ããAs I understand it, a lot of effort was made to contact Gameport about LORD and there was no response. I get the feeling the "the gameport guy" doesn't give a flying fudge about it. <shrug>ãã digital manããSynchronet "Real Fact" #98:ãSynchronet v3.12a was released on December 31st of 2004 (Rob's birthday).ãNorco, CA WX: 77.8øF, 56.0% humidity, 3 mph ESE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrsã---ã þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.netã

Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: Digital Man to MRO on Sat Aug 01 2020 08:50 pmãã >> okay i hope the gameport guy is okay with that.ãã DM> As I understand it, a lot of effort was made to contact Gameport aboutã DM> LORD and there was no response. I get the feeling the "the gameport guy"ã DM> doesn't give a flying fudge about it. <shrug>ãã DM> digital manããhe's an odd fellow. i still dont know what his name is, just that he works at multiserv.ããi guess in 2018 bill mcgarrity called a number he found for gameport and got ahold of some laura waldon at mseaudio.com and he got his reg code for lord.ããi know a guy that called multiserv and they had him on hold and he talked to a guy who wouldnt identify who he was but he cleared up his lord registration problem. he paid but never got the code.ã---ã þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::ã

Re: Re: Idea: Porting Usurper to Javascriptã By: MRO to Digital Man on Sat Aug 01 2020 09:25 pmãã MR> okay i hope the gameport guy is okay with that.ããHe hasn't responded to anyone in over a decade.ã---ãUnderminerãThe Undermine BBS - bbs.undermine.ca:423ãFidonet: 1:342/17ã---ã þ Synchronet þ The Undermine - bbs.undermine.ca:423ã