Hola!
Nueva tanda de los correos del climategate se difunden hoy, muchos otros se dejan con clave protegida para el futuro ...
"
<2440> Jones: I've been told that IPCC is above national FOI Acts. One way to cover yourself and all those working in AR5 would be to delete all emails at the end of the process
"
Esto es ciencia si se¤or ... a ver que nos depara el an lisis del nuevo contenido
http://noconsensus.wordpress.com/2011/11/22/climategate-2-0/
"
<2884> Wigley:
Mike, The Figure you sent is very deceptive [...] there have been a number of dishonest presentations of model results by individual authors and by IPCC [...]
"
"
<2009> Briffa:
I find myself in the strange position of being very skeptical of the quality of all present reconstructions, yet sounding like a pro greenhouse zealot here!
"
"
<0310> Warren:
The results for 400 ppm stabilization look odd in many cases [...] As it stands we'll have to delete the results from the paper if it is to be published.
"
"
<4470> Norwegian Meteorological Institute:
In Norway and Spitsbergen, it is possible to explain most of the warming after the 1960s by changes in the atmospheric circulation. The warming prior to 1940 cannot be explained in this way.
"
"
<3373> Bradley:
I'm sure you agree-the Mann/Jones GRL paper was truly pathetic and should
never have been published. I don't want to be associated with that 2000 year "reconstruction".
"
Javier
--- FPD v2.9.040207 GoldED+/W32-MINGW 1.1.5-b20070116
* Origin: Rafa STD Punto WeK (2:341/14.43)